Re-viewing of USC game thoughts
(Written by kencraw)
I re-watched the game (or said another way, watched the TV coverage for the 1st time since I was at the game). Here are some thoughts from that:
- What a game Beck had! Tackled the kicker on the fake field-goal attempt. Had a 3rd down pass breakup. Had a very nice tackle for loss. And of course the key interception that setup the go-ahead touchdown.
- I hadn’t noticed that Wharton was missing in the 1st quarter from the stands. That’s one of the harder things of being at the game. Minus the QB and the running back, it is generally tough to see who’s missing.
- The holding call on the long run play of Garbers was pretty marginal. Yeah, it was probably technically holding, but only in the ‘if you were to call every hold, there would never be a play without a penalty’ sorta way. The lineman disengaged pretty quickly and didn’t seem to meaningfully slow the progress of the defender once he had turned away from the legitimate block, particularly from the perspective of the likelihood he gets to Garbers before he gets downfield.
- While on the topic of long Garbers runs that were for naught, the fumble call was complete BS. The replay clearly shows his knee was down and his arm is still around the ball. Was the ball “starting” to come out? Perhaps. But his arm is still around the ball. It makes me want to look up just when the precise moment a fumble has happened.
- Not that anyone was doubting this besides the TV commentators, but going for 2-points when up 15-14 late in the 3rd was the right call. If this was Dykes Cal vs. WSU, then I get the “not until the 4th quarter” rule. But this was a defensive struggle. It was late enough in the game not a lot of other points were likely to be scored. (Which turned out to be true)
- The game had more dropped passes on the Cal side than I remembered.
- To give one concession to USC, the personal foul that extended Cal’s final drive was pretty harsh. I know I wouldn’t have been happy if it was the other way around. No pushing or shoving, just something he said from a few feet away. Yes, the USC guy should have been smarter and stayed away from the Cal sideline. But at the same time, unless he said something incredibly egregious, that’s a pretty harsh call on USC.
- In the podcast (yet to be published) I talked about how the 1st USC touchdown was a really good play call, putting Bynum in a really tough spot to cover the WR. What was noticeable on the re-watch was that Cal changed from having the DB follow the receiver to doing a “shift” of receiver assignments when USC brought one across the formation (most of the time). A wise decision.
- Something I forgot to mention on the podcast… boy was that stadium quiet starting at about 7 minutes left in the game. The USC fans were stunned!
- Another forgot to mention in the podcast… another game where the opponent wasting timeouts in the 2nd half came back to bite them. And both were really stupid. Why would they go for it on 4th and 2 from that point on the field? You can’t get in a play call in 40 seconds?
- USC really did leave a lot of points on the board. The fake field goal. The fumble in the redzone. The score should have been at least 20-0 if not 24-0 at halftime.
- For some reason it was more obvious to me watching the game on TV how much the field-position game was not in the Bears favor in the 1st half. They really shot themselves in the foot a couple of times, particularly that horrible kickoff.
More thoughts to come…