Incomplete (Cal 42, Louisiana Tech 12)
(Written by jsnell)
It’s telling, just how far Cal has come in the last six seasons, that a 30-point win at home doesn’t leave me walking on sunshine. Oh, I can see the sunshine from here, and I may go walk on it a little bit later. But enough things happened in this game that made it feel… incomplete.
• DeSean, get your head in the game. Today DeSean Jackson played like a guy who wanted to pad his Heisman highlight reel (or singlehandedly win the game), and instead he got exposed. He fielded several punts he shouldn’t have, and I have to guess that the coaching staff wasn’t thrilled about it, since he wasn’t out there to field the last La. Tech punt. He also dropped two balls, both of which were probably touchdowns. One of them was a bit tough — the pass was low and he was looking back at the sun — but he still probably should have caught it, and would have if he hadn’t been thinking about turning upfield and running for an ESPN highlight.
• Penalties’ll kill you. Lots of yellow flags today, including way too many false starts and a dumb (is there any other kind?) unsportsmanlike conduct foul. When you end up winning by 30, I suppose it doesn’t matter. But in a close game, those kind of penalties will kill you, and if you’re jumping like that at home, imagine what might happen on the road.
• Longshore’s inconsistency. Look, compared to Joe Ayoob, Nate Longshore is the second coming of Joe Montana. But while Longshore is a more accurate a passer than his predecessor, he has bouts of inconsistency where he struggles with his accuracy. During much of this game, Longshore’s passes were off, sometimes by a little, sometimes by a lot. I guess what I’m saying is, when he’s good Longshore looks like a prototypical Tedford quarterback: efficient, if a little robotic. But sometimes, for long stretches, he struggles to complete a pass. Let’s hope he steps up now that Cal’s headed into the Pac-10 schedule, because one of those cold streaks could lose a game down the line.
• Pac-10 officials? Avert your eyes. Several terrible calls from the officials, most stunningly the obvious fumble that was called a fumble on the field, overruled by another official who decided it was an incomplete pass, and then upheld as an incompletion after a review. Guys, the guy took multiple steps and lowered his head while running with the ball. It could not have been incomplete. And yet after looking at the tape, the replay officialy decided he couldn’t overturn the call. Gritting my teeth for another year of bad Pac-10 officiating…
Anyway, on the brighter side. Cal’s defense played much better, giving up yardage repeatedly on one over-the-middle pass but generally doing its bend-but-don’t-break thing with excellent results. Special teams, led by LaVelle Hawkins’s opening touchdown return, also generally did well. What a bad day for the Louisiana Tech kicker — he had a field goal try blocked, missed an extra point, and had a kickoff returned for a TD. At least the Bulldogs went for two after their second touchdown, sparing him yet another indignity.
Now let’s talk running backs. Despite the legend of Jeff Tedford, the wise trainer of efficient quarterbacks, I am getting the feeling that this year’s Cal’s team is best on the ground. Justin Forsett churned up 152 yards and three touchdowns, showing power and speed that remind me of J.J. Arrington in his prime.
And every time Jahvid Best touches the ball, it’s electrifying. He had a great kickoff return, as well as a mind-blowing end around. On the end around, there were at least two Tech players in good position to stop him. It’s the sort of play you see a lot, where enough defenders are in the area to blow the play open. Except, with Best, you just know that there’s no way those guys are going to get to him. And they didn’t. Jahvid The Jet turned on his afterburners and blew right past them. What an exciting player. As electrifying as DeSean Jackson can be when he’s not preening for his Heisman close-up, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that Jahvid Best is already threatening to supplant DeSean as the team’s most exciting player.
So in the end, while the pass offense’s sputtering made me a bit more nervous about this game than I should probably be, it’s still a 30-point win at home on a glorious late-summer day in Berkeley. I’ll take it.
Short Takes: See the rest of my game photos here… Cal public address announcer Dick Callahan, or as we prefer to call him, “AnnouncerBot 2.0 beta,” was nowhere to be heard today. Did his software crash? (Phil tells me he was subbing for Roy Steele at the Coliseum. Did you misplace your loyalty plug-in, AnnouncerBot 2.0 beta?)… Speaking of the public-address system, it was much less obnoxious today than in game one. Still not great, but not quite as bush-league a feeling as I got two weeks ago… Brought my kids to the game for their annual Berkeley trek, and let me tell you, the magic age appears to be 6. My daughter’s almost 6 and she was really enjoyable at the game today, which she hasn’t really been since she was very little. Of course the three-year-old was a handful, but whatcha gonna do?… Driving home listening to KGO, I was amused to hear Lee Grosscup on the post-post-game show, not because of anything Lee said but because after the Tennessee game the Cupper mysteriously disappeared and was replaced by a KGO broadcaster rambling about water rights in the Central Valley…. The crowd didn’t know whether to cheer or boo when it was announced that USC was losing (early) to Nebraska. I cheered, because my dislike of USC overrides even my pro-Pac-10 urges… Speaking of which, UCLA got spanked by Utah. Shows you how ridiculous pre-season rankings are. Did any of you really think the baby bears were good? As long as Dorrell is there, they’ll always be badly coached underperformers. Long may Karl reign over Bruins Nation… Stanford finally wins a game at the new Stanford Stadium! Even though Chelsea won there first… Cal really needs to schedule a series against Texas. When Texas was trailing in its eventual narrow victory over Central Florida(!), the score was announced to loud cheers. Yes, Mack Brown, we Cal fans will remember you and your big mouth until the day we play in Pasadena on New Year’s Day… And bringing up the rear is: Notre Dame! Insert your own punch line here.
September 16th, 2007 at 1:08 am
Amen to the comment about DeSean. His head has gotten so big that apparently the air in it has befuddled his brain into thinking that every single play has to be turned into a big one. Unlike some of the bloggers at the goldenblogs, I don’t think it’s just the amount of playmakers we have on our team–DeSean is good, he may be great, but Hawkins and Jordan have proved that they have the hands to make the catches, too. And when DeSean is trying to “pad his Heisman highlight reel” and making bad plays, then why NOT throw to our other guys?
September 16th, 2007 at 9:03 am
Cut DeSean a little bit of slack–we”ve seen him bust 70 yard TDs out of impossible situations on a number of occasions. I think he’s proved that he has the ability to turn even the smallest crack into a large opening. That being said, he does have a considerably large ego but so do a lot of players of his caliber. Yesterday wasn’t one of his better games and I’m hoping Longshore can start connecting with him more on longer balls.
As of right now, I think the most exciting & explosive player on the offensive side of the ball is Best. I look forward to watching him improve the rest of the year.
September 16th, 2007 at 9:43 am
I cut DeSean a lot of slack. But yesterday it seemed to me that he made numerous bad decisions. A few of them, slack will be cut. But viewing the performance as a whole? He was clearly trying too hard. Whether it’s because he wants the Heisman Trophy or because he feels he can singlehandedly help his team win games, he needs to make better decisions. He’s pressing, trying too hard to make something happen. He needs to dial it back, just a little bit.
September 16th, 2007 at 1:45 pm
Longshore’s big problem is hesitation in the pocket. He takes one, two, three steps back, and instead of zipping a pass, he waits a little too long to air it out. The receivers are out of position or the ball is thrown too far up or down. If he could be a step or two quicker in releasing the ball he’d have the advantage over the secondary, but he tries to be too perfect with his throws. Notice his best throws are quick slants or outs, as opposed to the deep up-the-middle passes.
September 17th, 2007 at 7:31 am
Ligten up on DeSean! The guys got a sprained finger that started out as a dislocation. When it happened he said he had to put it back in place. Playing with a sprain is very painful. I think that’s why the ball was popping out of his hands and he dropped the ball in the end zone. If I had his moves and speed I would be trying to fake the defender as well. None of the passes he caught on Saturday were the type where he was ahead of the defender. At least he is not like some receivers that head for the sidlines so they won’t get hit.
September 17th, 2007 at 7:45 am
I hate USC also, but you want them to win every game until they play CAL of course and then win the rest from there. We want LSU to beat Florida at LSU, then Florida beat LSU in the SEC playoff game. West Virginia needs to lose to Rutgers or anyone else. That would put OU as number 1 and CAL at number 2 and play each other in the BCS Championship game. Or OU could loose too. USC needs to stay on top until they play CAL, otherwise the game will be worth less in the voters eyes.
September 17th, 2007 at 9:16 am
@bar20: I call ’em as I see ’em. He was trying too hard on Saturday and it almost cost Cal. Of course, if his sprained finger was that severe it’s more on the coaches for not limiting his duty than it is on DeSean, but he made some really poor decisions in fielding punts, and I don’t think the finger affected his decision-making.
Just to be clear, as a Cal die-hard who’s been going to games for 30 years, I’m always going to speak my mind. And I am not one of those people who believes that if you’re not rooting, you’re not a fan. I will mix the positive and the negative, as I see fit.
On that topic, I realize mentally that USC should win every game except the one in Berkeley this year. And yet, in my heart, the only team I want to lose more than USC is Notre Dame. (That’s going well, by the way.) And I admit taking an unusual amount of joy out of UCLA’s loss, even though that hurts the Pac-10. As Woody Allen said, the heart doesn’t know from logic.
Also, I think planning out BCS scenarios after three weeks is a bit much. We’ll talk BCS after the USC game, maybe, but not before.
September 17th, 2007 at 10:38 am
I am only looking out for Cal’s best interest.
How did DeShawn cost them the game, they won by 30 points and he didn’t play in the fourth quarter.
My fisrt Cal game I saw in person was in 1958 I was 11 years old. I have been a fan ever since.
So you don’t think CAL is going undefeated? Realistically possibly not. I would rather think that they were, than they get beat by USC or Oregon. If Cal looses twice they are not going to the Rose Bowl. Notre Dame won’t be going to a BCS bowl this year but Hawaii could with their schedule.
You need USC to hold the #1 position before they face CAL. Then after CAL beats them you want them to win the rest of their games so they remain high in the rankings, so the loss carries more weight. I really don’t care if Cal doesn’t finish 1st or 2nd at the end of the year as long as they go to the Rose Bowl.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:04 am
@bar20: At Oregon, At Arizona State, At Washington, At UCLA. I think there’s probably a loss in there. But I would be delighted to be wrong.
“How did DeShawn cost them the game,” – I didn’t say he did, I said he could have cost Cal. His punting errors were their worst in the first half, when things were close.
I think we’re all in agreement that the Rose Bowl is the goal.