Can I make a suggestion?
(Written by kencraw)
Can we take a 4 game break from talking about how hot Tedford’s seat is?
I was thinking about how surprised I’ve been with how topsy-turvy the commenting has been on the other sites. There’s been very little moderation. Everything is either awesome and great or DOOOOOOMED! People are WAAAY over reacting to losses. People are saying we’re going to go 2-10, or “at best” 3-9, MAAYBE 4-8 with a miracle.
There just doesn’t seem to be any ability to take the bad games in stride and remember that all mediocre teams have good games and bad games and sometimes the best teams in the conference make mediocre teams look worse than they are. That’s what makes them the best.
Just to throw out a few of examples of that:
- Cal lost to USC 30-9, right? So we’re doomed to 2-10… wait THIRTY!?! That was last year’s score… yet the team went 7-5.
- Cal lost to Nevada 52-31, right? … OK, you’ve caught onto my game. 🙂 But in 2010 after that loss the Bears still went 5-7. A disaster yes, but not 2-10.
- Or how about that cross country trip against a ranked team, and lost 17-35? The Bears went 10-3 that season (2006).
And while there was wailing and gnashing of teeth after those losses, the overall outlook was never as bad as it has been this weekend. Why?
The only conclusion I could come to is that Tedford’s seat is getting hot. And I get it. We’re all sick of mediocrity and there’s little reason to believe at this point that Tedford will rise above it, particularly in the next year or two.
And part of that is it’s very hard to fire a coach who has been so beloved in the past. It takes a real act of will to cast him off. The way we emotionally accomplish that is by over-emphasizing our negative emotions to build up the strength to do it.
It will likely come to that at some point, perhaps at the end of this season, perhaps at the end of next season.
But I’d kinda like a chance to enjoy the games, between now and then. And if we can just all forget that Tedford is on the hot-seat for a few weeks, we might just be able to enjoy the games. I suggest 4 games, until after the Big Game. After the Big Game, Tedford will have either bought himself another season with lots of wins or his seat will be plenty hot and it’ll be time to have the REAL discussion on whether he gets fired.
In the mean time, we might be able to enjoy watching our mediocre Bears in what will likely be some close and exciting games. They may not win them all, but it’ll be exciting. Isn’t that why we watch the games, for some excitement and enjoyment?
September 24th, 2012 at 8:48 am
I don’t even think it’s the mediocrity (which sucks having enjoyed the early Tedford years), I think it’s seeing how good Stanfurd looks, how they’ve beaten USC 4 years in a row, and we’re just frankly not there. If both teams were 1-3 I think there’d be some wailing and gnashing, but seeing the divergence in fortunes is making the fanbase even more agitated.
September 24th, 2012 at 9:41 am
IMO Ian, it isnt just stanfurd but the fact every Pac 10 team with the exception of Cal and WSU (and the new teams) has beat USC at least once since 2003. Throw in the fact that SC hasnt been their usual dominate self over the last 3 years like they were from 03 – 08 and Cal hasnt scored a first half TD or meaningful TD since 2007 and it seems like Cal is not any closer to beating SC under Tedford.
I like Kens suggestion but that will only last if Cal actually wins their next three games. If they drop even one game, especially the game against ucla then you will see what little support Tedford has left completely erode.
September 26th, 2012 at 8:43 am
Since it’s your blog I will abide by your request!
September 29th, 2012 at 6:19 pm
Sorry Ken, time for Tedford to go and let the coaching speculation begin. Terrible game today by a team that completely lacked discipline.