The longest continually active Cal Bear blog

← Cal-WSU – The Photo Post
Oregon State game set for 4p.m., FSN/CSN →

Strength (and Weakness) of Schedule

(Written by jsnell)

I was perusing Jeff Sagarin’s computer ratings this morning. His composite ranking places Cal 17th in the country overall, though his Predictor rating (which is more accurate, though less politically correct because it takes into account margin of victory) places them 28th.

I was more amused by the ratings of the teams Cal has played this year. Talk about three stinkers: Maryland is rated 115th overall (below a few I-AA schools), Washington State is rated 119th, and I-AA Eastern Washington is rated just one slot below the Cougars at 120th.

Cal’s other wins were over Sagarin #42 UCLA and Sagarin #59 Minnesota.

In contrast, Cal’s losses? To Sagarin #3 Oregon and Sagarin #5 USC. That’s the good news. The bad news? Cal has yet to play Sagarin #14 Arizona, Sagarin #23 Stanford, and Sagarin #24 Oregon State. In terms of the pure Predictor rating, Sagarin would predict that Cal will finish the season 9-3, with wins over Arizona, ASU, and Washington and a loss to Stanford (!). I can’t really call that an unreasonable prediction. It might even be optimistic.

But as always, computers don’t play the games. So we’ll see.

For what it’s worth, Cal’s current ratings in the computer systems that make up a portion of the BCS standings: 26, 17, 27, 20, 15, and 21, for an average computer rating of 20th in the country. (Hat tip: Jerry Palm’s CollegeBCS site.)

October 25th, 2009 in Pac-12 Commentary, Team Commentary |

5 Responses to “ Strength (and Weakness) of Schedule ”

  1. # 1 ragnarok Says:
    October 25th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Actually, when you add in home-field advantage, Sagarin predicts a close victory over OSU and basically a pick-’em game vs. Arizona. With wins @ASU and @UW and a loss @Stanford, that gives the Bears either a 9-3 or 8-4 record.

    As it is, he’s calling us a 2-point favorite in Tempe this weekend, and that’s the only game worth worrying about right now.

  2. # 2 oski88 Says:
    October 25th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Well, clearly the predictor rating is slammed by the Bears losing so dramatically to Oregon and USC. The Bears were stunned in those games, and it seems like if you rely on those games to develop a mathematical model, your prediction will be overdone. We are not THAT bad to where we would lose those games by those margins if we played those games 10 to 20 times. The scores would be a lot closer, and we would actually win some of the games.

    I think if the Bears offense can play decently then there is no game that we can not win. There are no dominant defenses that we are left playing against. I think in this instance, the ELO chess model is a better predictor of Cal than the predictor model. I mean, at team that averages 45 points in 5 games and 3 in two games, one of the two is an outlier. UCLA and Washington State were not supposed to have totally crappy defenses. And even against SC, if riley could have connected on a few open guys, that would have been a totally different game.

    GO BEARS!!

  3. # 3 Jason Says:
    October 25th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    You’re right, ragnarok, I added rather than subtracted the OSU difference. That makes them 8-4. My bad math.

  4. # 4 Jason Says:
    October 25th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    I take it back, that’s even 9-3, but the Arizona result is so close it’s basically a toss-up.

  5. # 5 Jason Says:
    October 25th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @oski88- I dunno. I think it matters that Cal lost to USC by 27 at home and Oregon State lost to them by 6 at USC. I think that actually does say a lot about the difference between OSU and Cal, and it makes me think OSU is probably better than Cal. Of course, margin of victory is always somewhat shaky because teams tend to take their foot off the gas when they’re way ahead — Cal could have easily hung 70 on WSU yesterday, for example. But over the years, Sagarin has observed that his Pure Points method is the best predictor of future outcomes. The BCS just can’t use it because it encourages coaches to run up the score.

  • Recent Comments

    • Vegasbear on Colorado game thoughts
    • Vegasbear on Arizona game thoughts
    • kencraw on UNLV Game thoughts
    • BearBacker on UNLV Game thoughts
    • Adam on Back for another season
  • Categories

    • Academics
    • Administrative
    • Basketball
    • Bear Territory
    • Bowls/BCS
    • Coaching Commentary
    • Coaching News
    • EMFMV Podcast
    • Facilities
    • Fall Practice
    • Fans
    • Game Commentary
    • Game Previews
    • Lists
    • Live-blogging
    • Looking Back
    • Media Coverage
    • Officiating
    • On The Road Home
    • Opponents
    • Other Blogs
    • Other sports
    • Pac-12 Commentary
    • Pac-12 News
    • Personal
    • Play Commentary
    • Player Comentary
    • Player News
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • PSAs
    • Published Articles
    • Rankings
    • Recruiting
    • Road Trips
    • Scheduling
    • Season Practice
    • Spring Practice
    • Team Commentary
    • Team News
    • Tickets
    • Uncategorized
    • Videos
  • Archives

    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • April 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • June 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • February 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • May 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • September 2006
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org


Excuse Me For My Voice © 2007 All Rights Reserved. Using WordPress Engine
Entries and Comments.