Re-watch SDSU thoughts
(Written by kencraw)
Here are my thoughts on re-watching the game:
- Because how the game starts can heavily affect the flow and thus outcome of the game, one has to really shake one’s head at the inability of Cal to deliver on the long ball on their 1st two possessions. Overthrow by Webb and a holding penalty cost the Bears a potential 14-0 lead.
- I don’t have any data to back this up, but it sure feels to me like the Bears are more susceptible to the post-turnover big play than most teams. It just feels like there’s a long history turnover followed by easy TD. The Bears had the same thing happen after their fumble and immediate TD.
- I don’t think I can watch that kickoff return for a TD again without throwing up. How many missed tackles and bad angles can a team make in one play? Apparently at least 10 or so.
- To highlight some positives, it was nice to see Cal and Webb recognize how much they could abuse SDSU deep there late in the 1st quarter. Really kept the Bears in the game. But again, you put those two TD’s together with the two missed TD opportunities early, minus the horrible kickoff return and the free fumble TD, and this game could have been 28-0 in the 1st quarter and effectively over.
- In other words, starting fast can make a HUGE difference.
- Watching the Cal linebackers and safeties over-pursue Pumphrey and allowing him to cut back and abuse the defense was very disappointing. There were not many plays where he went long by speeding around the outside. Also note, Pumphrey only had 15 yards on his 1st 9 carries. It wasn’t his consistency that got him 10 yards a rush (at least not in the 1st half), it was the big plays.
- A bit of an aside, but the announcers for this game were pretty mediocre. Most announcers give some notion of where on the field a penalty flag was thrown and some indication of what sort of foul it might be. Not these bozos.
- And then there’s the pathetic tackling. If I was Dykes or Kaufman I’d ensure that the next 2 to 3 weeks of practice HEAVILY emphasized tackling drills and improved technique.
- Then there’s the interception. I went through a similar process as some other commentators of thinking it was really egregious and as I watched it more, it became more understandable. SDSU really did a good job of sniffing out the play and making life hard on Webb. Also, Webb was in the endzone when he threw the ball. That’s bad play-calling. A screen is a relatively high-risk play and one where it’s nice to be able to just take a sack and/or risk a grounding penalty when you have to abort when it gets sniffed out. Well, that’s a lot harder when you’re in the endzone making the throw. The offensive line deserves some of the blame too for not disguising it well.
- I join the announcers in being exacerbated by Cal’s inability to execute the induced offside play. I can’t think of anytime I’ve ever seen a team try to do that, GET the defense to bite, but someone can’t snap the ball to get the penalty. WTH?
- I’m also worried about conditioning a bit. The team seemed to be weakest at the end of both halves. Didn’t feel that way as much with the Hawaii game.
- I’m pretty disappointed in Webb’s sense of urgency during the 2 minute drill. You’ve got to be ready to snap the ball when the clock starts again. Webb has been blowing 5 to 10 seconds scanning the defense after the clock starts. At the end of the 1st half, the Bears get the ball with 0:34 remaining. The 1st play is a completion in bounds for a 1st down. The clock stopped with 28 seconds to set the chains. It’s not snapped until there are 23 seconds remaining. That’s just too long! Particularly with that few seconds remaining. Then Dykes calls a timeout at 16 seconds when it’s clear Webb is not going to be able to snap the ball right away. From 34 to 16 with only two plays, both of which were 1st downs? That’s just not going to cut it.
- Then there’s the weak sack and the two poorly thrown balls that suggest Webb doesn’t have that competitive edge that a great QB has… that ability to deliver great throws when it matters most.
- And then I really don’t get why they don’t throw the Hail Mary at the end of the half as opposed to the punt. Seriously? Dykes, you do realize you’re down 10.
- One of the things I most noticed on the re-watch was how many times the SDSU DB’s tried to jump the out patterns. They were only successful on the final play of the game, but it was not the 1st time they had tried.
- 3 turn overs, 4 plays, 3 touchdowns… is it that the defense wasn’t prepared to go back on the field? Is it that they’re demoralized? I don’t know, but if they could instead of folding, have stiffened, the game would have turned out very differently.
- I have to admit that my favorite RB in the rotation, Mohammad, did not have a very good game. It was Enwere who looked best out there today. But even he was hit and miss. The run game only worked when SDSU was expecting pass. Whenever we’d try to run it more than a couple times in a series, it would stop working.
- Webb is a couple beats too slow when checking down in the pass game. He also hasn’t been doing a good job of putting it in a place where the backfield receiver (usually the RB) is well positioned to get some yards after the catch.
- Something that didn’t get enough attention was how the Bears were unable to get in the endzone late in the 3rd quarter and most of the 4th. Field goal after driving the field then get an INT at midfield… another field goal. Another turnover on the SDSU side of the field… goes 4 and out (including one of those dangerous out-throws that the SDSU bit on and nearly intercepted). Scoring a TD on any one of those would have made a huge difference down the stretch. And they SHOULD have, after having been gifted two short fields on turnovers.
- As much as overall the breaks didn’t go the way of Cal, it wasn’t as unbalanced as I remembered. The 13 penalties on SDSU hurt them a lot. They had 2 turnovers to blunt part of Cal’s 4.
- I mentioned this in my other post, but I definitely saw it again on the re-watch, Webb’s accuracy went down late in the 4th quarter. Perhaps it is unfair to blame that on the game situation, but instead perhaps he was getting tired 70+ throws into the game.
- Since it wasn’t relevant to the outcome (although one should be careful, would SDSU have had to play more aggressive if they had to keep Cal out of field goal range and thus allowing Cal more opportunities down the field?), I had forgotten the ridiculous 2-point conversion play call. I can’t imagine a scenario that play works.
- Cal got a great bounce on the onside kick. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen such a textbook onside kick bounce.
Let’s see if Cal can improve!
September 13th, 2016 at 1:49 pm
Ken,
You are right on target. Defense only gave up 24ish points. Bears should have won. Easily.
Team tackling has to be addressed by Mr. Kaufman. If he doesn’t get the Bears to make the stops that they are in position to do, Texas and the rest of our foes will walk us right to the exit.
Offense did what they do. 40 should have been enough for a win.
I think Pumphrey is the real deal. Once he makes the side step he gets the next 8-12 yards.