Washington preview
(Written by kencraw)
Before the beginning of the season I predicted that it wasn’t outside the realm of possibilities the Bears could start 5-0 even if they weren’t that good. When it came to actually predicting the games, I predicted a 4-1 start, but swapped the loss with Arizona and WSU from what actually happened.
Thus the #1 question we need to ask ourselves is are we getting ahead of ourselves? I warned us not to get too excited about a 4-1 start and yet, here we are at 4-1 and we’re getting all excited. Is that because we qualitatively like what we see? Or are we letting the hype get to us? Are we just as doomed going into the back end as we were when we started?
To answer that question, let’s think about what has changed from pre-season predictions:
- Washington hasn’t exactly lit the world on fire, but won all the games it was expected to win and lost the one people thought they might (Stanford).
- But Stanford isn’t as good as we thought.
- Cal’s offense has clicked more than people thought it would.
- But the defense has improved less than we hoped.
- UW’s secondary has been more suspect than expected.
- UW’s offense has been inconsistent. Good at times, but surprisingly stifled at times.
Looking more specifically at the games played, Cal and UW have no common opponents yet. But we do have one chain of games that links the two teams together. UW beat Hawaii on the road, 17-16 whereas Colorado, who played Cal pretty straight up, beat Hawaii 21-12 at home. Overall that suggests all 3 teams are at least in the same general grouping, quality wise.
So I see three scenarios for this game:
- The UW secondary can’t do what no one else has been able to do… slow the Bear’s offense. At the same time Cal’s defense is relieved to finally be facing a more traditional defense and the defensive line asserts itself like it did against Northwestern and the Bears win big. (Unlike NW, there will be no 3rd quarter let-up this time.)
- The same as the 1st but instead the Cal defense shows just how far it has to go and we’re in another shootout. But with UW just not built to score points like Cal, Cal wins the shootout down the stretch.
- Cal’s offense runs into its 1st good defense and gets grounded. In this scenario, just like the inverse in a shootout, I just can’t see the Bears defense doing its part to win the game.
So it comes down to this, can the Bear-Raid put up the points this weekend? Because in both those scenarios, the Bears win. And the more I think about it, there’s nothing going on in Seattle right now that scares me. WSU’s defensive line was pretty stout and it didn’t hurt the Bears ability to put up 60.
Thus, not only am I sticking to the upset I called before the beginning of the season (although I guess the Bears are favored in Vegas as of this morning by 3.5 pts), I’m doubling down:
Bears 52, Washington 31
October 10th, 2014 at 11:28 am
Ken,
I like your call on the game. I think the Bears can score 52 on Washington if turnovers are not a factor. The 3.5 points the Bears are giving is primarily for a home game. Vegas thinks these teams are equal.
Speaking of turnovers…I don’t think there will ever be another FBS game that has 119 points scored and NO turnovers. There were 123 passes thrown and no interceptions. These QB’s are good! The only difference between Halliday and Goff is hair color. (Blond vs. Red)
October 10th, 2014 at 12:09 pm
I read on CGB that Maximo is back and will play. Khalfani had surgery on his thumb, and will play, but I worry about fumblitis in that type of situation. McClure might (once again) play. If we regain some depth in the defense, I will feel much better. Otherwise–I hope your prediction is on target!