The 3 phases of Tedford
(Written by kencraw)
I’ve had a few thoughts bouncing around in my head regarding Tedford’s personality that have finally gelled.
It started when comparing Romney to Tedford, not in their politics (I have no idea what Tedford’s politics are), but personality. People call Romney “The Android” because all his attempts at acting casual, where he shows his (supposedly) human side, all come out looking like an android who’s trying to fake it. It seems to me that Tedford suffers for the same sort of problem and it has most definitely affected the program.
But if it’s been a permanent defect, why didn’t it affect the early teams? And that’s when I hit upon the following 3-phase theory:
Phase 1: The freshman (2002-2006)
When Tedford came to Cal, he came to a program that was naturally VERY hungry. After years of failure, all of the players in the program were aching for a measure of success. They were ready to put their trust in anyone who had a plan for how to succeed. So when Tedford came in as a geeky, know-it-all freshmen, the team was perfectly happy to copy his homework, so to speak.
Tedford didn’t have to motivate, he just had to show the well motivated players how to succeed. And much to Tedford’s benefit, through his excellent skills as a coach, an undervalued talent rich team and a little bit of luck, success came right away. The freshman was a hero!
But like all freshmen with a little bit of luck, it wasn’t all Tedford’s doing. Also like all freshmen, he was humble enough and excited enough about the success to not over step his capabilities or to assume that it was all his doing. He continued to work hard, to continue to have success and as he continued to work hard and have success, he graduated.
Phase 2: The sophomore (2007-2010)
Sadly, all freshmen, with their quirky mixture of excitement, nervousness, undoubt and humility, must “advance” to becoming sophomores.
Sophomores know just enough to be dangerous. Humility gives way to a false confidence. They start to think they’re better at more than they are.
Thus Tedford hands off his best expertise, coaching quarterbacks and managing the offense, and tries to focus on “team chemistry”. One big problem: This isn’t his strength. As I stated in the lead-in regarding Romney, it’s not really believable. It’s not really him. He’s not particularly comfortable in the role.
To make matters worse, the false confidence, the lost freshman humility, exacerbates his difficulties. The result is a mediocre leadership job and a dearth of his tactical leadership of the offense. Nate Longshore never overcomes his 2007 injury. Kevin Riley never truly makes the most of his potential. A string of offensive coordinators who can never quite find their grove are invited in and escorted out after butting heads with a coach who can’t quite decide if he’s CEO or if he’s the tactical genius… and he handles the indecision like a sophomore, instead of like either an exuberant freshman or the more experienced upperclassman.
It’s probably worth taking a quick interlude to make clear that I think being a head coach is an exceptionally hard job, one that I doubt I could ever do. It’s a rare combination to find a mature man who both connects high school seniors to convince them to come to Cal and can continue that connection through their college years, all the while having the right combination of leadership that both disciplines and inspires, and the football knowledge/insight needed to make a top-flight football program work.
So when I say he struggled as a sophomore I say it in no more a condemning way than when I look back on my sophomoric periods in my life and wonder how I survived both because of how difficult those times were and how much of a sophomoric idiot I was. It’s empathy, not criticism, for the most part.
But struggle Tedford did. He put on a false facade of confidence like all sophomores do, but it’s transparently obvious to everyone else that it’s a facade. For the first time, people wonder if Cal is going to be successful in the long run.
Thankfully, like all sophomores, their false facade is only a mask and inside they’re working harder than they’re willing to admit. They’re torn up inside by what used to be so easy when they were a freshman and it really bothers them. It drives them to find new paths to success. It’s not an easy path and it’s full of lots of dead ends and stunted/foolish attempts to solve the problem.
Eventually, and not when the sophomore wants them to be over but when they’re truly ready, the sophomore does graduate.
Phase 3: The upperclassman (2011-present)
When I’ve watched the post-practice interviews, I’ve seen a very different Tedford than others. I’ve heard complaints about him looking bored or disengaged, sometimes too defensive, sometimes not defensive or passionate enough. That’s not the Tedford I see at all.
I see a Tedford who’s finally comfortable in his own skin. I see a Tedford who has true confidence in himself, not a false facade. I see a Tedford who’s jokes and off-hand comments reflect who he really is, not who he wants to pretend he is. He’s embraced that he’s more of a X’s and O’s nerd than an inspiring leader. He’s found a way to be the head of a program that works for him.
I don’t really know how it’s going to turn out. Not all upperclassmen are straight A students. Tedford’s natural skills may not be enough to be the well rounded head coach who can simultaneously entice, motivate, discipline, control, teach, form and be an expert at the game.
Early on, he didn’t need to be all those things. He was standing on the shoulders of others, who left him a somewhat intact city to build up. 10 years of head coaching behind him, he no longer has the luxury of standing on other’s shoulders. He must do it all himself and I don’t know if he has what he needs to be successful.
What I do know is that what we get out of Tedford in the next handful of years will be the best that Tedford can offer. We no longer have a freshman who’s figuring it out as he goes nor a sophomore who projects a facade of experience while struggling on the inside.
We finally have our upperclassman.
August 16th, 2012 at 5:53 am
KenCraw…love the new approach and I’m glad you’re back in it. I have no idea to run a blog, but I like the “one-man opinion” covering Cal and non-Cal things.
Regarding this post, I think this is very interesting take. Throughout the evolution of his career, particularly during the “team chemistry era/calling plays” era, I’ve wondered if he’s a great OC and a mediocore HC.
I’ve also wondered if the messenger, if not the message, is getting old.
Finally, I’ve wondered if the program can compete with the assistant coaching salary sprees of college football or if we’ll be stuck with an expensive head coach and assistant coaches that rival the cheap roster efforts of the Oakland A’s (young no-experience guys like QB coach Marcus Arroyo and multi-team retread journeymen like former OL coach Steve Marshall). Regardless of the snakey Sarkesian and Tosh, I like how UW management, despite being a public university, has supported Sarkesian with fine assistants. I don’t think the Cal program can afford to lose this arms race with UW and others.
August 16th, 2012 at 8:15 am
Hey carp, thanks for the feedback… we’ll see how it goes.
The salary question is an interesting one. Cal was willing to spend a bunch of money on Tedford’s contract early on and ended up blowing all their good-will with the rest of the University on one salary. Add in the UC budgets getting real tight and the underfunded SAHPC/stadium projects and Tedford’s/Barbour’s hands are tied (for the moment) as far as joining the assistant coaches arms races that is currently on-going.
This is probably worth a post of its own, but I’ve long thought part of the source of the criticism of Tedford sources from his salary. If he was only making 1.5M instead of 2.5M, which would put him more in the middle of the pack, people would be less critical of his performance.
When you get paid towards the top, people expect performance towards the top.
August 16th, 2012 at 10:57 am
KenCraw-
I have always appreciated your perspective on Cal sports and your passion for excellence in all the Cal athletic programs. Saw you and your boys a couple of years ago at the practice the FB team held at Grant HS (cute kids). Please continue to blog and provide your thoughts for the rest of us who share your Blue & Gold blood.
SGB
August 28th, 2012 at 10:34 am
you do know you have two phase 2’s … right?
August 28th, 2012 at 10:38 am
Huh? Looks fine to me…