Court Ruling: Eye of the Beholder Edition
(Written by Jason Snell)
UC Berkeley says the ruling is a “major victory.”
The oak people “are ecstatic” and “believe this project is now dead.”
Who do you believe? I’ve read most of the ruling and it sure sounds like the university has won most of the major points. However, it may take time for Cal to amend the plans for the SAHPC, and of course as soon as they do there will probably be more court shenanigans.
So for me, to sum it up: The university has won more than it lost, but it’s not a complete victory, and at this point any delay is a victory for the anti-stadium crusaders.
I do hope this means they can start cutting down trees, though. Because I am an evil tree-hater. Who rides the bus.
Loading ...
June 18th, 2008 at 9:38 pm
personally, having read through it myself, i’m pretty optimistic, but i’m not a lawyer. we shall see.
June 18th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Ken, can you email me? I converted the pdf to a searchable pdf using the character recognition tool in Acrobat 8.0. Makes it much easier to analyze when you can search for specific terms. I’ll send it to you.
OR, do you have the ability to do this yourself?… its under the menu “Document>>Recognize Text using OCR”
Either way, thanks for putting in the time.
June 19th, 2008 at 7:35 am
I’ll run the OCR command and upload a new version.
-jason