Stadium issues: Cal’s response
(Written by jsnell)
I just received this e-mail, forwarded to me by Sandy Barbour, about the issues with the stadium at the USC game.
Dear Cal Football Fans:
During Saturday’s Cal football game against USC, we know that many of you who attended had an unfortunate and unexpected gameday experience due to the long lines and congestion throughout much of Memorial Stadium. I want to apologize and, at the same time, make sure we move quickly to understand exactly what went wrong and let you know about the steps being taken to address it.
We have almost three weeks before our next home game against Washington State on Oct. 24, and with the help of the UC Police Department and other experts, we will be working diligently to improve pedestrian flow and crowd control.
An immediate review after the game found that almost half the crowd entered the stadium through just two gates – Gates 1 and 2 – near the north side of the stadium. The resulting bottleneck caused lines to back up, especially on the concourse level. Similar problems occurred in other areas of the stadium, as well.
We take your safety seriously and many valuable lessons were learned at the game. We did have additional staff placed in the concourse to assist with crowd control, but obviously it wasn’t enough, and we need to do a better job of monitoring and directing traffic.
Entering this fall, we knew that the potential for increased congestion in and around Memorial Stadium existed, and we worked with campus and city safety and security personnel to develop an access plan to help fans navigate around the High Performance Center construction zone. Although we had few issues the first two contests, the USC game clearly showed that we need to evaluate the plan’s effectiveness. The full release can be found by clicking here (Stadium Access Plan).
With construction of the Student-Athlete High Performance Center and the planned renovation of the stadium, we are well on our way to creating a better gameday experience for all. However, I will continue to do everything possible to minimize the impact of construction on some of the best days we have together as a Cal community. We will distribute our revised plan as soon as we fully identify and make the necessary improvements in our operations.
Thank you for your passionate support of our campus and Cal Athletics.
Go Bears,
Sandy Barbour Director of Athletics
My take: everyone entering through the north end of the stadium might be an issue, but as long as the Fun Zone is over there, it’s hard to see the traffic flow working much differently. I don’t think the entry point is the root of the problem. I think the fact that you can’t access most of the center section of the west side of the stadium (due to the construction project) without going through incredibly narrow passageways is the root of the problem. And more to the point, the capacity of the venue is the root of the problem.
If this is a sincere attempt to improve crowd control, great. Fantastic. I hope that’s what it is. But I’m not enthused by the “we’ll get back to you” tone of some of the paragraphs, the blame being placed on what I believe to be a side issue (i.e., the entry point), and the suggestion that “additional staff” would be able to somehow control such a massive crowd.
October 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
sandy, the last two losses will more than take care of the crowd problem at memorial.
October 5th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
It’s funny ’cause it’s true…
I expect to be able to spread out for the rest of the season, no doubt.
October 5th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
It seems their big assumption that is proving to be untrue is that people would enter via the entrance closer to their seats and that’s not happening.
And you know what, if there was a direct path from next to the I-House to the south entrance, I think they could force that, but because everyone has to backtrack on Piedmont Ave well past the stadium, past the I-House to the south to get the the narrow staircase (that many don’t know about) that will take them up there, it’s far more natural for people to go through the north entrance.
While they’re never going to solve that problem entirely, having security telling people on Piedmont (by the north entrance/Maxwell field and by where the buses drop people off, which entrance they should be going to, might mitigate that somewhat.
I still think the closing of the concession stands would help a great deal.
October 5th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Of course, the Fun Zone draws a lot of people to the north side, which doesn’t help matters.
October 5th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
What about entering at the North endzone then walking down to the bottom of the stadium and then continue walking to your section and then up the steps to your row? Is that feasible?
October 5th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
The approaches to the South entrance were no picnic. Hard to believe that they were that much better than the ones on the North Side.
October 5th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
bar20, that’s feasible if there isn’t a big crowd/flow. It’s single file in both directions at best and even that’s with lots of shoulder grazing/pushing. That was gridlocked too early in the USC game because lots of people were trying it.
October 20th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
I know the crowd flow is a safety issue…but I’m more concerned that the dstadium is on the Hayward fault…