The longest continually active Cal Bear blog

← Crackpot theories for Cal’s collapse
Boo (USC 30, Cal 3) →

Stadium issues: Cal’s response

(Written by jsnell)

I just received this e-mail, forwarded to me by Sandy Barbour, about the issues with the stadium at the USC game.

Dear Cal Football Fans:

During Saturday’s Cal football game against USC, we know that many of you who attended had an unfortunate and unexpected gameday experience due to the long lines and congestion throughout much of Memorial Stadium. I want to apologize and, at the same time, make sure we move quickly to understand exactly what went wrong and let you know about the steps being taken to address it.

We have almost three weeks before our next home game against Washington State on Oct. 24, and with the help of the UC Police Department and other experts, we will be working diligently to improve pedestrian flow and crowd control.

An immediate review after the game found that almost half the crowd entered the stadium through just two gates – Gates 1 and 2 – near the north side of the stadium. The resulting bottleneck caused lines to back up, especially on the concourse level. Similar problems occurred in other areas of the stadium, as well.

We take your safety seriously and many valuable lessons were learned at the game. We did have additional staff placed in the concourse to assist with crowd control, but obviously it wasn’t enough, and we need to do a better job of monitoring and directing traffic.

Entering this fall, we knew that the potential for increased congestion in and around Memorial Stadium existed, and we worked with campus and city safety and security personnel to develop an access plan to help fans navigate around the High Performance Center construction zone. Although we had few issues the first two contests, the USC game clearly showed that we need to evaluate the plan’s effectiveness. The full release can be found by clicking here (Stadium Access Plan).

With construction of the Student-Athlete High Performance Center and the planned renovation of the stadium, we are well on our way to creating a better gameday experience for all. However, I will continue to do everything possible to minimize the impact of construction on some of the best days we have together as a Cal community. We will distribute our revised plan as soon as we fully identify and make the necessary improvements in our operations.

Thank you for your passionate support of our campus and Cal Athletics.

Go Bears,

Sandy Barbour Director of Athletics

My take: everyone entering through the north end of the stadium might be an issue, but as long as the Fun Zone is over there, it’s hard to see the traffic flow working much differently. I don’t think the entry point is the root of the problem. I think the fact that you can’t access most of the center section of the west side of the stadium (due to the construction project) without going through incredibly narrow passageways is the root of the problem. And more to the point, the capacity of the venue is the root of the problem.

If this is a sincere attempt to improve crowd control, great. Fantastic. I hope that’s what it is. But I’m not enthused by the “we’ll get back to you” tone of some of the paragraphs, the blame being placed on what I believe to be a side issue (i.e., the entry point), and the suggestion that “additional staff” would be able to somehow control such a massive crowd.

October 5th, 2009 in Facilities |

8 Responses to “ Stadium issues: Cal’s response ”

  1. # 1 rollonubears Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    sandy, the last two losses will more than take care of the crowd problem at memorial.

  2. # 2 Jason Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    It’s funny ’cause it’s true…

    I expect to be able to spread out for the rest of the season, no doubt.

  3. # 3 Ken Crawford Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    It seems their big assumption that is proving to be untrue is that people would enter via the entrance closer to their seats and that’s not happening.

    And you know what, if there was a direct path from next to the I-House to the south entrance, I think they could force that, but because everyone has to backtrack on Piedmont Ave well past the stadium, past the I-House to the south to get the the narrow staircase (that many don’t know about) that will take them up there, it’s far more natural for people to go through the north entrance.

    While they’re never going to solve that problem entirely, having security telling people on Piedmont (by the north entrance/Maxwell field and by where the buses drop people off, which entrance they should be going to, might mitigate that somewhat.

    I still think the closing of the concession stands would help a great deal.

  4. # 4 Jason Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    Of course, the Fun Zone draws a lot of people to the north side, which doesn’t help matters.

  5. # 5 bar20 Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    What about entering at the North endzone then walking down to the bottom of the stadium and then continue walking to your section and then up the steps to your row? Is that feasible?

  6. # 6 Jim Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    The approaches to the South entrance were no picnic. Hard to believe that they were that much better than the ones on the North Side.

  7. # 7 Ken Crawford Says:
    October 5th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    bar20, that’s feasible if there isn’t a big crowd/flow. It’s single file in both directions at best and even that’s with lots of shoulder grazing/pushing. That was gridlocked too early in the USC game because lots of people were trying it.

  8. # 8 Angel the Duck Says:
    October 20th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    I know the crowd flow is a safety issue…but I’m more concerned that the dstadium is on the Hayward fault…

  • Recent Comments

    • Vegasbear on Colorado game thoughts
    • Vegasbear on Arizona game thoughts
    • kencraw on UNLV Game thoughts
    • BearBacker on UNLV Game thoughts
    • Adam on Back for another season
  • Categories

    • Academics
    • Administrative
    • Basketball
    • Bear Territory
    • Bowls/BCS
    • Coaching Commentary
    • Coaching News
    • EMFMV Podcast
    • Facilities
    • Fall Practice
    • Fans
    • Game Commentary
    • Game Previews
    • Lists
    • Live-blogging
    • Looking Back
    • Media Coverage
    • Officiating
    • On The Road Home
    • Opponents
    • Other Blogs
    • Other sports
    • Pac-12 Commentary
    • Pac-12 News
    • Personal
    • Play Commentary
    • Player Comentary
    • Player News
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • PSAs
    • Published Articles
    • Rankings
    • Recruiting
    • Road Trips
    • Scheduling
    • Season Practice
    • Spring Practice
    • Team Commentary
    • Team News
    • Tickets
    • Uncategorized
    • Videos
  • Archives

    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • April 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • June 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • February 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • May 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • September 2006
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org


Excuse Me For My Voice © 2007 All Rights Reserved. Using WordPress Engine
Entries and Comments.