Washington (former) Live-Blogging
(Written by kencraw)
OK, here we go Bears fans… it’s raining, it’s cold and the Bears need a win badly:
- For starters I’m surprised that this game is on ABC. It definitely reflects how few Pac-10 games there are this week.
- As expected, Locker isn’t playing, Carl Bonnel will start… isn’t that the same guy who gave us trouble last year?
- TV commentary says “Longshore finally heathy”… I’ll believe it when I see it.
- Got to love those bogus stats: “Willmingham has beat Cal 7 of the 9 times he has played them”… um… yeah, back when he was the head coach of Stanford. Against different coaching staffs. What does that have to do with anything?
- Kay kicked off!?! Isn’t that usually Larson’s job?
- Ugh…. that kind of run defense is going to make for a long game. Definite over-pursuit by the linebackers. That’s the same thing that killed them against UCLA. Huskys in Cal territory on one play.
- 1st and goal from the 9. Thankfully it’s the 9, but lets be honest, this is a REALLY bad start for the Bears defense.
- GAH! That was WAY too easy. Cal is going to have to entirely rework their inside run defense if they’re going to hold the Huskys: 0-7
- Make them re-kick!… YES!!!
- Well we only got an extra 6 yards but it’s clear there is opportunity for more.
- This offensive line has been a HUGE run blocking disappointment. I’ve never known of a team with such good pocket protection and such horrible run blocking.
- GAH! We can’t have penalties like that. (Delay of game) That was a first down given away.
- And now we’re punting on a 3 and out… that doesn’t give the defense much time to scheme and fix their run problems. Thankfully it’s a comercial break to give them a little more time.
- This is making it look like USC’s ability to run the ball last week had less to do with USC and more to do with Cal’s defensive line.
- Cal really loading the box now… sets up a big play-action opportunity. Of course as long Moye is missing tackles like that on the reverse, they may never have to throw.
- Really slippery ball today. That’s 3 bobbles/fumbles in two plays.
- This is just ridiculously horrible. This run defense S.T.I.N.K.S. so far. They’ve only thrown the ball once on this drive and they’re still destroying the Bears and dragging people into the endzone: 0-14
- So to recap, we’ve got two entirely on the ground drives by UW that bookmarks a pretty pathetic 3 and out by the Bears. If this doesn’t change soon this is going to be the worst loss of the Tedford era. There’s your AF-LACK trivia question for you: What’s the Bears worst loss of the Tedford era?
- I’ve been really disappointed by Cal’s kickoff runbacks in the 2nd half of the season, particularly by Hawkins. There’s been far too much delaying and stutter stepping and not enough RUNNING!
- Good to see that the Cal running game is starting to get some traction… but it won’t matter unless the defense can improve.
- Now THAT’S the type of play action Cal needs! Way to go both Longshore throwing on the move and DeSean both getting open and making the most of the opportunity.
- OK, into the redzone. Let’s count the runs and passes. Come on Tedford! Now is the time to pass-first!
- YESSSSS!!!!!!!!! See what I’m talking about? These defenses are biting SO hard on the run game in the redzone that the passing game has all kinds of room to navigate.
- Ugh… that missed extra point may come back to bite us later. Gonna need a 2-point conversion at some point (maybe anyway).
- Hey, was that some heat coming through the line for the Cal defense? Miracle of miracles. Maybe Cal has got some heart back.
- Great defensive series for the Bears. Good pass pressure, good run stopping, good coverage down-field. Here’s hoping for a turn around.
- End of first quarter recap: Washington owned the ground on their first two possessions driving for two easy TDs. Cal seems to have dug deep and drove for a TD themselves and then held the Huskys to a 3 and out. Good old Mo’ is in Cal’s corner right now.
- Two good 3rd and short runs by Forsett to keep this 3rd Cal drive alive.
- Here’s a key 4th down from the UW 45… review… nope, that was not a 1st down, they’re wasting our time with this review.
- Just so it’s out there, I’m OK with a QB sneak… well, that run by Forsett worked well too.
- YES!!! Yet again going to the air in the redzone and a 2nd TD: 13-14… the only thing separating the Bears and Huskys now is a bad extra-point snap/hold.
- Hicks my man, how can you miss that interception!?! Boy would that have been sweet.
- Yet another great series by the Cal defense. Cal now gets the ball back with an opportunity to take the lead after a DeSean punt return that made a little something out of nothing on a booming punt.
- Ugh… Longshore’s obligatory “ill-advised decision” happens in a bad spot. Come on Defense! Bail us out.
- Let’s not be too harsh on Longshore for that one. Every QB gets one mistake a game.
- I get the feeling the Cal defense is not very well conditioned because it seems like the Cal offense giving them time to rest makes an unusually huge difference in their defensive strength. Yeah, they were given a rough situation in this instance, just a few seconds off, but there’s been a trend of this all season: 13-21 (on the short-field TD for UW)
- I used to pride myself in the WR blocking for Cal, but this year these WRs have lost what they used to have. That out to DeSean should have been a 5-10 yarder if Jordan could have blocked his guy. Instead it’s a 10 yard illegal block penalty on a block that didn’t even spring the play loose.
- Forsett, don’t run sideways/backwards!
- Some comercial time analysis: The Bears are back in this game and seem to be playing with heart. Yes the Longshore mistake hurt the Bears but they’re still only down 8 in the middle of the 2nd quarter with a great deal to be hopeful about. Let’s see if the defense can continue to step up because that will be the key to giving a start-and-go offense the opportunities they need to catch up.
- That holding penalty was key. Washington had the running game going again when they were put back to 1st and 20. Three incompletes later (with good pressure on the QB I might add) UW was punting.
- What a great run by Forsett… ah Fouts… a Forrest Gump reference, really?
- Let’s see, three redzone apperances and we’ve got 3 TD’s on 3 passes (and zero runs). I bet you next time Cal is in the redzone there might be some run plays and there will be a lot more running room than in past games: 20-21
- OK, I probably agree that Hampton touched the ball, but the TV commentators have WAY too much confidence in the “no question it hit his hands”. It was pretty marginal. I could see it going either way… OK defense. Do it again.
- That sack was huge because it used their last timeout. That means it’s all pass plays from here on out. Just ask Riley on the sideline, he’ll tell you why.
- Ugh… that hurts. I really though the Bears would hold to the field goal. That was wise of UW to pick on Conte. He’s a young kid and doesn’t know how to defend the fade route yet to be able to stop that: 20-28
- IDIOT TV COMMENTATORS. The Bears will get the ball to start the 2nd half.
- Halftime analysis: Two turnovers deep in Cal territory has led to 14 UW points. Seeing as how Washington has been completely ineffective otherwise after their first two drives where the Cal defense couldn’t stop the run game, I think there is a lot to be hopeful about. The Bears are dominating on both sides of the ball ever since the mid-1st quarter. As long as they can keep the mistakes to a minimum in the 2nd half and I think the Bears win this one running away with it late in the game. The 8-point deficit is the least of the Bears concerns at this point. All they have to do is play the way they did in the 2nd quarter minus the mistakes.
- I guess I should change that above statement: IDIOT TEAM CAPTAIN! That stinks.
- Um… we can’t afford for the beginning of the 2nd half to go like the beginning of the 1st half… what’s going on guys?
- So the way I see it, between kicking twice and that big run, Cal just spotted UW another 3 points, now down by 11: 20-31.
- FINALLY a down-field pass! Now let’s see if the Bears can finally punch it in. Please, please, please pass the ball.
- See, now the Bears are up a creek. If they pass early, they’re keeping the defense who is expecting a run on their heals. But now that it’s 3rd and goal from the 4 and it’s clearly a passing play making it much more difficult. The result, they’ve got to kick the FG: 23-31
- At least the defense is back on track and forces a 3 and out. The open receivers are a little troublesome but it’s a 3 and out nevertheless.
- I think the big question: When do the Bears go for 2?… perhaps I’m getting ahead of myself, but to some extent the game is settling down and there may not be as may future scoring opportunities as the 1st half would indicate. Of course as soon as I say that the Bears go 3 and out.
- This is trouble. This defense looks tired. Another series where the 3 and out exposes their conditioning issues.
- How horrible is that? That “intentional grounding” went wrong on so many levels. Not only would the Bears have picked it up, The replay should have looked at that and pushed them back another 8-10 yards to where the ball was when it was called dead. And then how can they give up a 1st down on 3rd and 24!?! Conte has potential but boy is he young. Hampton really has blown it to lose his starting job to a guy as young as Conte.
- OK, now it’s time to start worrying. 11 points with the vast majority of the 3rd quarter behind us and the offense not dominating like they were before… it’s starting to look a little bleak after that field-goal: 23-34.
- These refs are horrible and I’ve seen this over and over this year. They seem to presume it is a fumble and let the replay booth overturn it. But because there must be conclusive evidence, anything marginal is considered a fumble. That ball was knocked out by the ground. It was obvious to me at full speed and it’s doubly obvious in slow-motion.
- Further proof in the final result: the ridiculous play stands.
- That 4th down stop was HUGE. Breathed some life into a growingly desperate situation.
- What did I say at halftime: Need to keep the mistakes to a minimum. These penalties and miscues are killing the Bears.
- How can we be running the ball on 3rd and 34? Why not do what UW did and just air it out and hope to get lucky like they did.
- THESE STINKING REFS ARE BLIND TODAY! Not only are the Bears stinking it up but we’re getting screwed by the refs too. They’d better overturn this one.
- And so is the replay booth. This is just ridiculous.
- OK, this is what it comes down to: 3 drives at the most, no extra points to give. They MUST get two touchdowns.
- Hawkins has GOT to catch that ball!!! That kills.
- There’s never been a more critical time for a 3 and out for the Bears… and it’s not happening. They’re only 10 yards from FG range to put this game away.
- Under 4 minutes now… we’re nearly at on-side kick time if the Bears can close this one up on the next drive.
- That’s pretty much the game right there. First down with 2:35 to go inside FG range… call the fat lady.
- Oh, while we’re fuming, here’s some fuel to throw on the fire: Washington’s only Pac-10 win before this was over lowly Stanford… they’re the bottom of the Pac-10.
Final analysis: My pre-game analysis was correct. The Bears would decide who won this game. If they could play anywhere even close to their potential they’d win. If they didn’t, they’d lose. During those periods that Cal played reasonably, they dominated. But they came out of the tunnel flat and gave up 14 quick points, then another 14 off of stupid turnovers, and that was all UW needed to win (as the Bears only scored 23). Beyond that, this game is on the defense’s back. They let the UW running game run all over them even when it was blatently obvious that they were going to the running game (like on the last drive).
I’ve been pretty forgiving of the defense in past games saying that they have been holding the opposition to the low 20’s. Well guess what, 37 ain’t the low 20’s. And it was against the bottom of the Pac-10.
This is seriously the most frustrating season for me in my memory. Even 1-11 wasn’t as frustrating to me. I was only expecting 3 or 4 wins out of that team. It’s twice as ridiculous that this team is guaranteed to have a losing Pac-10 record and has to pull out a win against Stanford to keep above .500 overall. This team is way too talented for that.
Frustrating, ridiculous, frustrating.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
On paper I think Cal takes this in a walk. But with the rain and the way this season has gone who knows what will happen. Show us something bears!
November 17th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Noooooo, not Dan Fouts. Great, three hours of listening to him rag on Cal.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:51 pm
Wow, just wow. I know it’s early but Cal’s D looks lifeless on that first drive, like they could care less.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:52 pm
Too true Joshiemac. I hate the way Fouts rags on players and teams.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:55 pm
What’s that red stuff on Nate’s hand? I imagine it’s some soft of sticky/traction thing for the rain?
November 17th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
I wondered that too joshiemac. Or perhaps residue from fresh balls or something?
November 17th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
2nd string D line in. Wow. I feel like I’m watching a horrible car wreck unfold out on the 5.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:03 pm
why does it already feel like this team has given up..
November 17th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
I have to agree, it looks like they have given up. It’s still early and with the wet field anything can happen but this is just ugly. What a heartless performance so far.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Ok, Justin & O line. That’s a start!
November 17th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
GREAT through Nate! That’ll do wonders for your confidence!
November 17th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
Um, that’s throw. I can’t spell when i’m excited.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
Good series, D. Nice play by Hampton there.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
Those highlights of last week is the first time I’ve seen those throwbacks on TV. Gotta say they look pretty sharp. I love the classic blue and gold but I would’t be against wearing those every Joe Roth game.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
NICE! TD bears! Kind of sketchy throw but I’ll take it.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
Yeah, I loved the throwbacks. If I wasn’t a father of 3 young boys I’d be bidding on those jerseys and helmets.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
longshore should look this good every week.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Kk, another good series by the D. Keep it up!
November 17th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
Ugh. So much for momentum.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
scratch what i said. longshore back to his normal great play.
November 17th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Please stop this Desean Jackson spotlight extravaganza.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Oops, looks like he is really hurt. Hope it’s not serious.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:22 pm
Turnovers have just killed us this year.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
-2 turnrover ratio, with 14 points resulting. that is how you lose football games. way to end the half on a positive note, bears.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
this should be 20-14. longshore and hampton handed them two touchdowns.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:32 pm
Great, and we don’t even get the ball back after the half because Tedford chose to kick. Please explain why he did that again?
This team is just SOOOOO difficult to watch.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Am I wrong? Does Cal get the ball back? I hope I’m wrong. Serves me right for listening to Fouts and crew.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:39 pm
joshiemac, I could be wrong, but you can “defer” to the 2nd half and I suspect that’s what they really did but somewhere between the ref and us “defering” got translated into “decided to kick” which is entirely different.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:45 pm
I’m not sure. I think Washington won the toss, they deferred , and Cal chose to kick. That means Washington get to choose at the second half, no?
If this is true, this will be one of the most stupid mistakes I have ever seen at any level at any time of my life. Even in high school ball our coaches would talk us though every coin flip possibility before going out there for the toss.
Ugh. I really hope I’m wrong on this.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:53 pm
Yep, Cal kicked. Consider that another turnover then. Man, that’s bad.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Rankin may drop 350 on us.
November 17th, 2007 at 3:56 pm
If it makes you feel any better Joshiemac, Holmoe made the same mistake once too.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
That doesn’t make me feel that much better, Ken. 😉
I was living in Europe for a lot of the Holmoe era so I probably missed that.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:23 pm
Horrible non-call there.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
I’m going on vacation before the Big Game (that’s what I get for letting my wife plan vacations!) so this might be the last Cal game I watch this year. I have to say, the way it’s looking now I can’t wait to put this season and this team behind me. As a diehard fan this season has just been too frustrating to keep my sanity.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:44 pm
2 and 30 and 2 straight running plays. It’s like Tedford has given up, too.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
How could they not overturn that? Cal is playing a horribly, but they are getting no help from the refs or the booth. Just bad all around.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
How about a little urgency here by the Cal O? Only 6:17 left and still a long way to go.
November 17th, 2007 at 5:12 pm
That’s just about it. Nice one, Bears. Way to get beat again. It’s possible that Cal can end up tied for last in the Pac 10. I’ve been an optimist up until now, but it’s time to face the facts. This is season is a unmitigated disaster and one of the worst in Cal football history, considering everything that has happened and where we once were. I feel like everything Tedford has built since 2002 is just in ruins.
November 17th, 2007 at 8:45 pm
Now Joshie boy, that sure doesn’t sound like you! Where are all of your fancy arguments now? Just kidding bro, but I did warn you. I tried to warn everyone.
Can we still get into the Emerald Bowl?!?
Man, that was the one thing I was still hoping for, but can we still get in? I don’t think we can. Ken, do you know?
November 18th, 2007 at 9:45 am
Ah Seth, the Cal blogosphere wouldn’t be the same without you.
I’m all out of fancy arguments. In the famlily friendly nature of Ken’s blog, I’ll keep it clean: this team stinks. They can’t even get a coin flip right.
November 18th, 2007 at 12:47 pm
I’ve been trying to understand something since about halfway through the 2006 season. I think Nate is a great QB, but he’s had some serious injuries and off-games. WHY does Tedford keep him in there when he’s playing like crap? Especially when he’s injured? Tedford yanked Lynch out of a game or two when he fumbled. And that goes for all the other players, but not the QB. At least, not Nate. Why even have a backup QB if he almost never gets to play? Tedford is far too devoted and loyal to Longshore, when he should be loyal to the entire team, the school and the fans! If I were Nate and playing so bad, I’d want to come out of the game.
November 18th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Is it too early to consider firing Tedford? I have been to every single Cal home game since 2002, and I fully appreciate how far he has taken us. But he seems incapable of getting us to the elite level and to a BCS bowl. Considering our talent, we should have gone to a BCS bowl in 2004, last year, and this year.
November 18th, 2007 at 8:18 pm
Fire me? Are you insane? I am a God in this town. I made this team the competitive powerhouse that it is today. Granted, I have had a few misteps along the way, but what coach hasn’t? Also, all of this talk about firing some of my assistants is nonsense. They have poured their blood and sweet into this program more than any of you fans ever have. Perhaps some of you should learn a lesson about L-O-Y-A-L-T-Y, that’s right, loyalty.
The fact that you are not being loyal to me shows how ungrateful some of you are. To those still supporting me thank you. Next year will be better, I promise. Nate will be back in perfect form and Gregory and all of the assistant coaches will continue to build this team into an even bigger powerhouse. Patience, my friends, patience.
CJT
November 19th, 2007 at 9:03 am
Well, I have to agree with some of the posters here and disagree. Re: JoshieMac, I agree. Without Seth, the Cal blogosphere would be a desolate wasteland of reason and logic.
Re: The Duke, I agree, you have been to every home game since 2002.
Re: Jeff Tedford, uh, I know this is awkward, but will you sign my chest? Was going to use some more hilarious body parts, but out of respect to the Crawstapo over here, I held back. So, if you didn’t laugh at that joke, don’t blame me (or even a blame pop). Blame the Disneyfication of the Cal Blogosphere.
November 19th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
Thank you, Twist, for stepping in. Times like these desperately call for heavy doses of both humor and sober reasoning. I’m not any good at providing the former, but I’ll try to provide some of the latter.
I suggest the current wave of Tedford detractors check out the career coaching record of Barry Alvarez at Wisconsin to see how patience in a good coach can pay off. The Badgers were 11-22 his first three years before breaking through with a Rose Bowl appearance–their first since the 1960s–in 1993. Then, the team went into not one, but FOUR straight years of mediocrity. The ’94 season wasn’t bad (8-3-1), but the next three all featured 5 losses apiece and a Big-1Ten1 finish no higher than fifth. While Alvarez earned a lot of good will from the Rose Bowl season, there were more than a few Badgers fans wishing he would go. But the patience and stability paid off, as this 4-year run was followed by back-to-back Rose Bowl championships in 1998 and 1999. More mediocrity did indeed follow, but I for one wouldn’t mind seeing Tedford stick around for 16 years and compile a winning percentage of better than 60%, with three conference championships in the mix.
Could we dream even higher? Of course. But Pete Carroll’s Trojans are the exception, not the rule, and if that sort of dominant run is what you expect for any college football team, then you are seriously deluded. Just look at the losses compiled the last year or two by the likes of Oklahoma, Florida, Texas, Penn State, Florida State, etc.. Winning is never guaranteed in college football, especially not in the current era of scholarship limits and ubiquitous TV exposure. It wasn’t that long ago that Arizona panicked and fired Dick Tomey. Look where they are now. And what did Oregon do when the Ducks hit rocky times? They stuck with Bellotti and now find themselves just an unlucky knee injury away from likely playing for the national championship and a Heisman trophy.
No question this season has been an unmitigated disaster for the Bears. And no question that 2008 will make a big statement toward the future of Tedford football at Cal. But it is WAY too early to abandon ship now. Keep your fingers crossed regarding the upcoming legal ruling, and especially should that go our way, the future still looks bright. The Bears will bounce back.